Translate

donderdag 30 april 2026

Safari sled dogs in Finland spend 6 months a year when there is no snow in a cage or on a chain severely neglected: business at the dogs' expense

Not all safari dogs are kept this horrific way. However, when the winter is over the tourist industry has no idea where the dogs are kept. This has to change. 


 https://sey.fi/sled-dogs/  Please sign the petition and share.

Business at the dogs’ expense

Many of the dogs bred for the sled dog business spend almost half of the year in an outdoor cage with inadequate exercise or stimulus. The dogs working at husky safaris can receive insufficient care and, in the worst case, both the feed and the living conditions are entirely unfit for keeping dogs.


The demand for husky safaris and sled dog operators has surged alongside growing tourism in Lapland.

The growth in the industry has been partly at the expense of the dogs’ wellbeing. Many of the operators that had previously offered dog sledding on a smaller scale, have grabbed the opportunity to grow their business.

This page contains images and videos that may be upsetting.


1. Thousands or tens of thousands of dogs?

The rapid rise in tourism is visible in the companies that offer husky safaris in many ways. For instance, a company which used to have a few dozen sled dogs, may suddenly have hundreds of dogs.

All dogs in Finland should be registered to a national dog registry, but in practice, dogs working for husky safaris are rarely registered. Therefore the officials, or anyone else, don’t know the exact number of dogs.

Koira häkissä katsoo kohti kameraa. Maa on hyvin mutainen ja koiran tassut märät ja likaiset.

2. Dogs’ living conditions don’t bear scrutiny

The safari dog lives either in a cage the size of a few square meters, or at the end of a few meter long chain. In practice, dogs have often been kept in even smaller cages or shorter chains. The dogs may have a doghouse, but they may lack insulation. The winter temperatures up North can fall to -30 or -40 degrees Celsius.

Among the common issues with husky safaris are: small cage sizes in relation to the size of dogs kept in them, the shortness of the chains the dogs are connected to, structural and/or insulation deficiencies in the kennels of puppies and nursing mothers and thin furred dogs during the winter, sparse bedding, not cleaning the kennels and dental problems.


3. Without work, the dogs have nothing to do

Summers are a particularly miserable time for safari dogs, as they are rarely, if ever, let out of their cages or off their chains. There is a smaller workforce at the husky farms during the summertime, and the dogs can end up spending days or even weeks in their cages or connected to a short chain.


4. Neglecting the dogs’ health care

SEY has seen a large on seen a large amount of evidence sent by ex-workers of husky safari companies  detailing numerous deficiencies, and hundreds of images and video footage of the conditions at many different companies providing husky safaris.

According to the workers, it’s typical that dogs aren’t taken to the veterinarian when necessary, and that only the most severe cases or the most valuable individuals receive medical attention.

Lähikuva koiran huonokuntoisista hampaista.

5. The origin of the dogs often remains unclear

Some of the sled dog operators import their dogs with improper documentation. According to information obtained by SEY, several sled dog operators operating in numerous municipalities have imported dogs multiple times by van from France, Poland, Norway and Sweden. The dogs have been obtained from local kennels without the necessary entry documentation.

As the demand for dogs speeds up, the means can be unscrupulous: dogs are imported regardless of import regulations or vaccinations, or the dogs are bred at an unsustainable rate. Accidental litters are also common.

In the worst cases, the dogs aren’t vaccinated, dewormed or taken for veterinary care when needed. Even dozens of dogs have been imported at once.


6. The competence of the workers and company owners is often lacking

The sled dog industry often attracts young, foreign seasonal workers, who don’t necessarily have any previous knowledge of handling animals.

There is no qualification for setting up a sled dog business. In practice, anyone can start up a company offering sled dog safaris and purchase hundreds of dogs.

According to the information acquired by SEY, some of the husky safari operators are employing untrained or minimally trained sled dogs on their safaris. Also, the training and handling of the dogs might be based in old-fashioned beliefs or e.g. violence.


7. Officials don’t have the time to pursue the cases

The Regional State Administrative Agency should, by law, be informed before starting up a professional sled dog business. Many companies observe this, but because it is common practice in the industry to use subcontractors, it’s possible that some of these dogs never get registered by the authorities.

In many cases, the operator moves to an other municipality or even to a different country when they encounter problems with the authorities in one place. SEY knows of many cases where the operator has been condemned for animal welfare offences in Finland, but has transferred their activities to Sweden or Norway, or vice versa. Often, they flee the area before sentencing, as the Finnish, Swedish and Norwegian authorities don’t have systematic cooperation on sled dog related issues.


8. Thin furred dogs are used in safaris

Winter weather in the north of Finland can be merciless. The Alaskan Husky is typically used in the sled dog business. It is not approved by the Finnish Kennel Club as an official dog breed. It is a breed that has been developed by crossbreeding Siberian Husky with e.g. Greyhounds and other fast running hound-type breeds. There are lineages within Alaskan Huskies, which are considered as “proper” Alaskans by some enthusiasts. In practice, any crossbreed used as a sled dog is called an Alaskan Husky.

Some of the sled dog operators use so called hound type short haired dogs. These dogs can’t handle cold environments even with a jacket and boots. Frostbite and freezing are common.


9. No water for the dogs

According to the Animal Welfare Act, dogs must have constant access to water. At the moment, however, the law allows for an exception specifically regarding drinking water for sled dogs. According to the law, when the ground is frozen, it is not necessary to provide constant access to water for the sled dogs, but instead, considers it sufficient to provide water three times a day. SEY believes this is insufficient especially considering these are hardworking animals.

In practice, many sled dog operators provide water even fewer times a day than the legal requirement. According to the information acquired by SEY, it is typical for some of the companies to provide the morning feed in a soupy form and provide water only once later in the day. The dogs eat snow to quench their thirst, but to get enough liquids out of snow, the dogs would need to eat substantial amounts of snow. 


10. All is not well in the end

The life of a safari dog typically ends when the dog can no longer work. Some farms take the dogs that are unfit for work at the end of the season, and put them down e.g. by shooting them, others just leave the dogs at the farm. Living at the farm is not necessarily cosy for a canine pensioner, if the dog is not able to move outside of the cage or chain, and if it isn’t able to have veterinary care when necessary.

Some farms give the old dogs up for adoption, but very few farms have responsible and ethically operating adoption programmes.


Sinua saattaa kiinnostaa myös

What to remember when you want to see animals on your visit to Lapland

How to know if the animals encountered during your travels in Finland are…

woensdag 29 april 2026

Why is Iceland still whaling ? Planning in 2026 a horrific death of 318 whales shot with exploding harpoons ( read More )

 



Iceland will allow up to 318 whales to be killed this summer. That’s 318 too many.



Last week, Iceland released its summer whaling quotas for 2026. In a notable cut from previous quotas, the government will permit up to 150 fin whales and 168 minke whales to be killed—a total of 318 whales.

Iceland stands alongside Japan and Norway as the only countries still conducting commercial whaling, despite the global moratorium adopted by the International Whaling Commission in 1986.

Even one whale suffering the particularly horrific death of being shot with exploding harpoons is one too many. So even with the decreased quota, it is shocking Iceland still allows whaling at all, especially because a bill to ban commercial whaling in Iceland is expected to be introduced later this year.

The question is not whether Iceland should ban whaling. The question is why hundreds of whales may still die just months before a proposal to ban such cruelty is presented to parliament.

Read more

Related Stories

FacebookTwitterInstagramYouTubetext

View in browser

 

Donate today to stand up for animals who need you.

© 2026 Humane World for Animals, Inc.
1255 23rd Street, NW, Suite 450, Washington, DC 20037
donorcare@humaneworld.org | 202-452-1100

maandag 27 april 2026

Fantastic video of a Sumatran orangutan finally using the canopy bridge to reach a new area of rainforest


 

This is it. The moment we have been patiently waiting for since SOS and TaHuKah first began our canopy bridge project in West Toba over two years ago.


A young male Sumatran orangutan has used our canopy bridge to cross over the road and reach a new area of rainforest!

He confidently strolls across the bridge, pausing to take in the view. Then, with one final glance back at his home behind him, crosses over the road.

This is a world-first for Sumatran orangutans.

This truly is the best video you’ll see all day — all year maybe!

This landmark moment, recorded on a camera trap in the Pakpak Bharat district of North Sumatra, is a world-first for the species. While other primates, including gibbons, langurs, and macaques, have previously been observed using the canopy bridges to cross the public road, this event confirms that critically endangered Sumatran orangutans can and will use canopy bridges to overcome forest fragmentation.


Learn More: A Sumatran Orangutan Crosses the Road!

Whether you’re curious about the science behind our canopy bridges, or a journalist looking to report on this world-first conservation milestone, we invite you to explore the journey of our canopy bridges.



What are canopy bridges? How did TaHuKah choose where to put them? Can they hold the weight of multiple orangutans? Follow the timeline from the very first surveys to the incredible moment a wild orangutan made the first crossingHuKah worked with government partners (North Sumatra Conservation Agency and North Sumatra Provincial Environment and Forestry Service). Thank you to the Pakpak Bharat District Government.  Thank you to all of our wonderful donors, including Size of Wales, IUCN Asian Species Action Partnership, European Outdoor Conservation Association (EOCA)  and DierenPark Amersfoort Wildlife Fund

vrijdag 24 april 2026

This must stop ! Animal torture in laboratories worldwide,: 9 graphic photos taken by a lab worker in two UK testing plants ( not suitable for children )

 


By TOM KELLY, INVESTIGATIONS EDITOR  https://www.dailymail.com/news/article

Fingers pinching its mouth open as a tube is pushed down its throat, this disturbing image shows how monkeys are sacrificed to check the safety of new weight-loss drugs. 

The unprecedented footage supplied to The Mail on Sunday was secretly filmed by a lab worker at two UK testing plants who said he was horrified the 'immense distress' the animals endured.

Restrained long-tailed macaques have new anti-obesity medication fed into their stomach to help assess if it is fit for human use.

Beagles, pigs, rabbits and other species also underwent 'extreme suffering' during trials for other new drugs before they can be sold in high street chemists, the worker said.

This includes not only potential treatments for serious diseases but many new products of everyday medicines such as headache tablets, cholesterol drugs, reflux medications, antihistamines, antibiotics and antidepressants.

All the animals that survive the tests are killed at the end of the process and their bodies dissected for further studies.

The UK testing facilities he worked at are contracted by major pharmaceutical companies to conduct required safety tests using animals before they can progress to human clinical trials.

Both sites are Home Office regulated and operating completely within the law.

The unprecedented footage supplied to The Mail on Sunday was secretly filmed by a lab worker at two UK testing plants. Pictured: A monkey being restrained ahead of tests

The unprecedented footage supplied to The Mail on Sunday was secretly filmed by a lab worker at two UK testing plants. Pictured: A monkey being restrained ahead of tests

The tests are carried out to determine safety margins for use of the drug, how compounds move around the body and what affect this has on organs

The tests are carried out to determine safety margins for use of the drug, how compounds move around the body and what affect this has on organs

Masks are strapped to the faces of beagles and monkeys and the trial substance inhaled by the animals. For these tests, monkeys are prepared by being restrained in vices around their necks and waists

Masks are strapped to the faces of beagles and monkeys and the trial substance inhaled by the animals. For these tests, monkeys are prepared by being restrained in vices around their necks and waists

ut the former lab worker said he wanted the footage and details of what happened to be released to ensure an informed public debate on the use of animal testing.

He described being 'haunted' by the shrieks and whimpers of animals during the trials, which could last for up to two years.

'My conscience wouldn't let me just quit and walk away,' he said. 

'I felt if I was able to provide a window into this world that had been hidden from public view, perhaps it would change.'

Campaigners immediately called for the Government to 'accelerate' its pledge to phase out tests using animals, branding the footage 'shocking.' 

But an animal testing advocacy group said 'extreme suffering' was extremely rare and the trials remained vital for producing life-saving medication and ensuring drugs were safe for human use.

The tests are carried out to determine safety margins for use of the drug, how compounds move around the body and what affect this has on organs.

The most common, called 'oral gavage' involves a rubber tube pushed down the throats of restrained animals into their stomachs to have the substance fed directly into their body.

This method is used for long-tailed macaques to test medication for liver diseases and weight-loss drugs and beagles for anti-inflammation drugs.

In other tests, masks are strapped to the faces of beagles and monkeys and the trial substance inhaled by the animals.

For these tests, monkeys are prepared by being restrained in vices around their necks and waists.

Both methods were also used to test psychoactive and psychedelic compounds on beagles, including cannabis extracts and an ingredient found in ecstasy, as part of research into potential drugs to treat psychiatric and behavioural disorders, the former lab worker said.

Mini pigs are used to test medication for ulcers and skin infections by using treatments where eight cuts are taken from the back of the struggling animal and a gel applied daily, the lab worker said.

Mini pigs are used to test medication for ulcers and skin infections by using treatments where eight cuts are taken from the back of the struggling animalF

Mini pigs are used to test medication for ulcers and skin infections by using treatments where eight cuts are taken from the back of the struggling animalF 

In other tests, masks are strapped to the faces of beagles and monkeys and the trial substance inhaled by the animals

In other tests, masks are strapped to the faces of beagles and monkeys and the trial substance inhaled by the animals

Pregnant rabbits are used to the test the effect of a new drug on the survival and development of an embryo

Pregnant rabbits are used to the test the effect of a new drug on the survival and development of an embryo

Pregnant rabbits are used to the test the effect of a new drug on the survival and development of an embryo.

There are also intravenous tests, where the animals are restrained and the test compound is injected directly into their blood stream, either as a single injection or infusion over a period of time.

The former lab worker who filmed the tests said: 'I had no idea what toxicity testing regulations required until I applied for a job at the facility, and I quickly realized that no one, except those who work there, do.

'I wouldn't have taken the risks I did [to secretly film] if I hadn't believed that the sole reason this continued was because the public didn't know.'

He said he and his colleagues cared about animals but their jobs required them to 'facilitate their suffering'.

'The mantra that comes with the job is that you are doing something positive for the world.

'There were even signs on the walls to remind us – but it didn't take me long to stop 'drinking the Kool-Aid' and start thinking, 'how could anything positive come from this?'

'Procedures that the public would find shocking had been normalized as part of regulatory testing. 

'Everyone I worked with cared about the animals but there was little we could do to ease their suffering.

'I found it almost unbearable at times to know that I was contributing to it.'

Lab workers sometimes played music to try to distract themselves but it was impossible to ignore the animals distress and 'intense suffering,' he said. 

'The primates would struggle, cry out and scream to avoid the tube from being forced into their mouths.

'I'll never forget the loud squealing of mini pigs as they were subjected to various procedures.

He said when it was time to kill the animals at the end of the trial the workers were 'devastated.'

'Part of you knew that it meant an end to their suffering, but it still felt like a final violation.'

His intervention comes after the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agency announced last month guidance to help drug developers create alternatives to animal testing to trial new products. 

The American regulator said it wants a shift to 'human-centric models' which it said can 'more reliably, efficiently and ethically predict human drug reactions prior to clinical trials'.

Last year the FDA claimed: 'There is growing scientific recognition that animals do not provide adequate models of human health and disease.

'Over 90 per cent of drugs that appear safe and effective in animals do not go on to receive FDA approval in humans predominantly due to safety and or efficacy issues.'

It said animal-based data have been particularly poor predictors of drug success for multiple common diseases including cancer, Alzheimer's and inflammatory diseases. Some medications which are generally recognized safe in humans, such as aspirin, may have never passed animal testing, it said.

'Conversely, some compounds which have appeared safe in animal models have been lethal in human trials.'

The FDA announced plans to develop replacements to animal testing that would include computer modelling and artificial intelligence to predict a drug's behaviour and lab-grown human 'organoids' and 'organ-on-a-chip' systems – both advanced models that can mimic human liver, heart, and immune organs to test drug safety.

But pro-testing advocacy groups said the figure cited by the FDA was a complete 'misconception' likely to be removed in time and said clinical trials showed that animal data is usually the same as human data 90 per cent of the time.

Chris Magee from Understanding Animal Research said 'extreme suffering' for animals in such tests was very rare and the footage obtained by the lab worker sounded like it highlighted the 'rarest and most severe experiments required or permitted by law.'

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agency announced last month guidance to help drug developers create alternatives to animal testing to trial new products. Pictured: A monkey being restrained ahead of tests

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) agency announced last month guidance to help drug developers create alternatives to animal testing to trial new products. Pictured: A monkey being restrained ahead of tests

Campaigners immediately called for the Government to ¿accelerate¿ its pledge to phase out tests using animals, branding the footage ¿shocking'

Campaigners immediately called for the Government to 'accelerate' its pledge to phase out tests using animals, branding the footage 'shocking'

Chris Magee from Understanding Animal Research said ¿extreme suffering¿ for animals in such tests was very rare and the footage obtained by the lab worker sounded like it highlighted the ¿rarest and most severe experiments required or permitted by law'

Chris Magee from Understanding Animal Research said 'extreme suffering' for animals in such tests was very rare and the footage obtained by the lab worker sounded like it highlighted the 'rarest and most severe experiments required or permitted by law'

He said: 'It is already illegal to use an animal in research if a non-animal alternative is available. 

'Dogs and primates are the least used animals and cannot be used if another species can be used in their place.'

Routine animal testing was introduced in the UK in 1968 following instances of medicines, including thalidomide, that had not been fully tested in animals causing harm to humans, he said.

In law, testing on primates can only be used 'for the purpose of the avoidance, prevention, diagnosis or treatment of debilitating or potentially life-threatening clinical conditions in man,' he added.

Any test likely to cause pain, suffering or distress to the animal must be performed with anaesthesia or painkillers, unless that would defeat the purpose of the experiment, he said.

Mr Magee said that while there has been a 43 per cent reduction in animals used for regulatory testing in the past decade, it would not be possible to stop all animal testing for many years to come.

This is because alternatives like cell cultures or 'organs-on-chips' cannot yet replicate the complexity of a full organism.

Animal testing is not just about identifying toxicity but understanding how substances behave in a whole living system, he said.

This includes how drugs are absorbed, distributed and metabolised and how they may change – potentially into something dangerous – as they move to different parts of the body.

The tests also determine how the drugs may impact and potentially harm the environment after they are excreted.

He also stressed that many of those drugs sold in chemists – such as cancer treatment andstatins – are life saving.

Euthanising animals after such tests was necessary as post-mortem examinations were the only way to detect thecauses and development of diseases, he said.

Labour pledged to phase out animal testing in its General Election manifesto but last year Science Minister Lord Vallance said that stopping all animal testing was 'not possible anytime soon'.

Lyn White, director of Animals International, who was approached by the lab worker to help highlight the issue, said: 'What this evidence shows is not just isolated procedures but animals enduring weeks and sometimes months of repeated dosing, restraint and confinement.

'Their suffering and distress are not momentary – it is prolonged and cumulative.

'These animal tests, despite being conducted in the name of public safety, have been hidden from public view.

'Without transparency, the public has never had the chance to voice whether this suffering should continue.'

Labour MP Irene Campbell, chairman the of All-Party Parliamentary Group on Phasing Out Animal Experiments in Medical Research, said: 'The terrible suffering experienced by these animals and shown in this exposé underlines the need for bold and immediate action to accelerate the phase-out of animal experiments.

'These must be replaced by the innovative, human-specific methods that offer the best chance of progress for patients.'